In "How to Improve Delivery Operations Management," Dave Kopf, Editor of HME Business writes, "One of the major elements of HME business overhead is running delivery and repair fleets and their supporting operations. It is a staff-intensive, and involves continuing regular capital expenditure for fuel and repairs, as well as depreciating assets — the vehicles — that need to be regularly replaced."
Kopf points out that the practice of managing deliveries and planning routes consumes a good amount of staff time, which also means more overhead. The HME industry has been grossly underserved with technology until recently, and most HMEs are still in the dark ages when it comes to leveraging technology.
Managing deliveries is both complex and expensive. Kopf and other experts note primary costs to consider, below. Ankota offers additional guidance on how technology can address and reduce these costs directly. I cannot speak for other software companies, but in our experience with Ankota's HME Optimization technology, these results can be achieved in less than one quarter, even making the system self-funding.
It's a matter of survival. With reimbursement cuts, many HMEs are certain to fail. Technology MUST be leveraged immediately to improve profitability and allow providers to survive and grow with fewer staff. It's all about productivity improvement and that is best achieved through automation.
A few more things to consider when choosing a system:
Delivery of Home Medical Equipment (HME/DME) is critical to the overall success of the healthcare system. HME Providers must utilize technology to maintain viabillity and survive resimbursement cuts. Technology can be used to improve profitability quickly and put HME providers in position to participate in Coordinated Care and Accountable Care models. Without Care Coordination technology that ties delivery operations to those who plan and authorize care, HMEs will be left out.